建筑工人不安全行为的认知失效致因仿真研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.002

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 6-12.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.002

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

建筑工人不安全行为的认知失效致因仿真研究

叶贵^1,2 教授, 越宏哲^1,2, 冯新怡^1,2, 李元莉^1,2, 陈俐莹^1,2

1 重庆大学管理科学与房地产学院,重庆 400045;
2 重庆大学可持续建设国际研究中心,重庆 400045

收稿日期:2020-08-07 修回日期:2020-10-15 出版日期:2020-11-28 发布日期:2021-07-15
作者简介:叶贵 (1976—),男,四川三台人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事建筑安全、健康城市等方面的研究。E-mail:yegui760404@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71972020)。

Simulation study on causes of cognitive failure of construction workers' unsafe behavior

YE Gui^1,2, YUE Hongzhe^1,2, FENG Xinyi^1,2, LI Yuanli^1,2, CHEN Liying^1,2

1 School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China;
2 International Research Center for Sustainable Built Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

Received:2020-08-07 Revised:2020-10-15 Online:2020-11-28 Published:2021-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提升建筑施工安全管理水平,有效降低建筑工人不安全行为,梳理出影响建筑工人不安全行为认知过程失效的7类个体因素和4类环境因素,建立认知过程失效致因的4阶段模型,并采用软件Matlab仿真多因素导致认知失效的过程。结果表明:环境因素通过影响个体因素作用于建筑工人的认知过程。安全意识、安全知识不足会导致建筑工人第1阶段的认知过程失效;低估风险会导致建筑工人第2阶段的认知过程失效;未选择安全动机和较低风险接受程度会导致建筑工人第3阶段认知过程失效;未正确执行行动会导致建筑工人第4阶段认知过程失效。良好的主观规范有助于纠正建筑工人第2阶段的认知偏差。

关键词: 建筑工人, 不安全行为, 认知过程, 个体因素, 环境因素

Abstract: In order to improve safety management in construction and effectively reduce unsafe behavior of construction workers, seven types of individual factors and four types of environmental factors affecting cognitive process failure of their unsafe behaviors were sorted out. Then, a four-stage causation model of failure was established, and Matlab was used to simulate process of cognitive failure caused by multiple factors. The results show that environmental factors affect workers' cognitive processes by influencing individual factors. Inadequate safety awareness and safety knowledge will lead to cognitive failure in first stage while underestimating risk is a main reason for it in second stage. Failure to choose a safe motivation and lower risk acceptance will lead to cognitive failure in third stage, and failure to perform actions properly leads to that in fourth stage. Moreover, good subjective norms help to correct cognitive bias in second stage of workers' cognitive process.

Key words: construction worker, unsafe behavior, cognitive process, individual factors, environmental factors

中图分类号:

X910

叶贵, 越宏哲, 冯新怡, 李元莉, 陈俐莹. 建筑工人不安全行为的认知失效致因仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 6-12.

YE Gui, YUE Hongzhe, FENG Xinyi, LI Yuanli, CHEN Liying. Simulation study on causes of cognitive failure of construction workers' unsafe behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(11): 6-12.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部办公厅.住房和城乡建设部办公厅关于2018年房屋市政工程生产安全事故和建筑施工安全专项治理行动情况的通报[EB/OL]. [2019-11-19]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201903/t20190326_239913.html.
[2] 郁润, 张知田, 郭红领. 数据驱动的施工现场工人不安全行为管理方法 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 130-135.
YU Run, ZHANG Zhitian, GUO Hongling. A data-driven management approach of construction workers'unsafe behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29 (8): 130-135.
[3] 张孟春, 方东平. 建筑工人不安全行为产生的认知原因和管理措施 [J]. 土木工程学报, 2012, 45(增2): 297-305.
ZHANG Mengchun, FANG Dongping. Cognitive causes of construction worker' s unsafe behaviors and management measures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(S2): 297-305.
[4] 那赟, 栗继祖, 冯国瑞. 群体认知对个体不安全行为意向的跨层次影响 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(2): 13-19.
NA Yun, LI Jizu, FENG Guorui. A cross-level influence of group cognition on individual unsafe behavior intention[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(2): 13-19.
[5] 刘嘉伦. 建筑工人的安全认知偏差特性及形成机理研究 [D]; 镇江:江苏大学, 2018.
LIU Jialun. Study on the safety cognition deviation characteristics and formation mechanism of construction workers [D].Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2018.
[6] AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
[7] JIANG Zhongming, FANG Doingping, ZHANG Mengchun. Understanding the causation of construction workers' unsafe behaviors based on bystem dynamics modeling [J]. Journal of Management In Engineering, 2015, 31(6): 4014099.
[8] 叶贵, 越宏哲, 杨晶晶, 等. 建筑工人认知水平对不安全行为影响仿真研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 36-42.
YE Gui, YUE Hongzhe, YANG Jingjing,et al. Simulation study on influences of construction workers＇bounded rational cognition on unsafe behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(9): 36-42.
[9] WANG Jiayuan, ZOU P X W, LI P P. Critical factors and paths influencing construction workers' safety risk tolerances [J].Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2016, 93: 267-279.
[10] CHANG Y H J, MOSLEH A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. part 1: overview of the IDAC model [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92(8): 997-1 013.
[11] ZHANG Peiyao, LI Nan, JIANG Zhongming, et al. An agent-based modeling approach for understanding the effect of worker-management interactions on construction workers' safety-related behaviors [J]. Automation in Construction, 2019, 97: 29-43.
[12] WACHTER J K, YORIO P L. A system of safety management practices and worker engagement for reducing and preventing accidents: an empirical and theoretical investigation [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 68: 117-130.
[13] FANG Dongping, WU Chulin, WU Haojie. Impact of the supervisor on worker safety behavior in construction projects [J]. Journal of Management In Engineering, 2015, 31(6): 04015001.
[14] REASON J. Modelling the basic error tendencies of human operators [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1988, 22(1/2/3/4): 137-153.
[15] CHOI B, LEE S. An empirically based agent-based model of the sociocognitive process of construction workers' safety behavior [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2018, 144(2): 04017102.
[16] SWAEN G M H, VAN AMELSVOORT L G P M, BüLTMANN U, et al. Fatigue as a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident: results from the maastricht cohort study [J]. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2003, 60(S1): i88-i92.
[17] LIANG Huakang, LIN K Y, ZHANG Shoujian. Understanding the social contagion effect of safety violations within a construction crew: a hybrid approach using system dynamics and agent-based modeling [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(12): 27.
[18] LOMBARDI D A, VERMA S K, BRENNAN M J, et al. Factors influencing worker use of personal protective eyewear [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2009, 41(4): 755-762.
[19] 张孟春, 方东平, 佟瑞鹏. 脚手架工人低估不安全行为风险的研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(8): 145-150.
ZHANG Mengchun, FANG Dongping, TONG Ruipeng. Study on underestimating risks of scaffolders to unsafe behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21(8): 145-150.

建筑工人不安全行为的认知失效致因仿真研究

Simulation study on causes of cognitive failure of construction workers' unsafe behavior

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张萌, 韩豫, 刘泽锋. 深度学习下建筑工人高空安全防护装备检测方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 140-146.
[2]	刘耀, 焦双健. ST-GCN在建筑工人不安全动作识别中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 30-35.
[3]	石娟, 常丁懿, 郑鹏. 基于BP神经网络的建筑工人不安全行为预警模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 27-33.
[4]	李妙慧, 栗继祖. 群体动力对矿工不安全行为意向的影响研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 48-55.
[5]	曹璐璐, 刘艳. 有限空间作业人员不安全心理与行为关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 70-75.
[6]	安宇, 李子琪, 王袆, 郭子萌, 张姜博南. 基于FBN的高校实验室不安全行为风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 160-167.
[7]	刘林, 梅强, 常志朋. 国内70年来员工不安全行为研究:发展阶段、研究热点及趋势分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 1-12.
[8]	栗婧, 王真, 秦亚茹, 汪振, 罗江昊. 不同噪声强度对煤矿工人作业失误率的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 179-184.
[9]	张明媛, 徐琴. 施工工人不安全行为传播模型与干预效果分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 1-9.
[10]	李琰, 毛钰, 张燕. 建筑工人应急行为影响机制^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 1-7.
[11]	陈梅, 祁神军, 牛达钰, 张云波, 吴国来. 主观社会支持对建筑工人心理及不安全行为的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 30-37.
[12]	叶贵, 李学征, 向卿婷, 越宏哲. 建筑工人故意违章行为动机形成机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 12-17.
[13]	王如冰, 万欣, 毛鹏, 李德智, 汪翔. 乘客不安全行为与地铁事故关联性的fsQCA[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(7): 152-158.
[14]	温廷新, 王贵通, 孔祥博, 刘孟潇, 薄靖凯. 基于迁移学习与残差网络的矿工不安全行为识别[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 41-46.
[15]	叶贵, 陈俐莹, 冯新怡, 杨晶晶, 越宏哲. 噪声对建筑工人冒险行为的诱发机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 16-23.